MingSir恩典曙光

文/HuSir

　　在刚刚落幕的2026年全国两会上，“增强经济韧性”“练好内功”“智能制造”“具身智能机器人”成为最热的高频词。代表委员们热议如何以新技术、新质生产力应对外部不确定性，芜湖机器人产业集团等企业更是把“人形机器人训练”当作未来竞争力。表面看，这是中国式现代化的壮丽图景；但如果把镜头拉近到基层，尤其是国企、纪委办公室、执行一线，你会发现一个反复出现的幽灵：把人当作机器，把执行力当作唯一法宝。

这不是新现象，却在2026年AI智能体规模化“上岗”的背景下，变得格外刺眼。

　　回想我们今天讨论的那些鲜明“形象”——文革时期的造反派，把“革命执行力”当成最高准则，红袖章一戴，亲人邻里瞬间变成“阶级敌人”，人性开关被彻底关掉；
　　疫情期间的“大白”，穿上防护服就成了流动的“清零机器”，破门、转运、隔离，多少次把活生生的人当作“风险点”，事后不少执行者自己都得了PTSD；
　　如今的国企纪委干部、基层员工，又被反复强调“政治执行力”“不折不扣落实”。上级定调，层层加码，出了问题基层背锅——和当年“大白”何其相似。

　　最经典的比喻还是那颗螺丝钉。雷锋时代就喊“做一颗永不生锈的螺丝钉”，如今升级成了“数字螺丝钉”：AI智能体能自主规划、调用工具、执行任务，2026年已从“对话助手”进化成真正介入工作流的“数字员工”。企业效率确实上去了，但人呢？被要求关掉质疑、关掉同理心，只剩“服从+指标”。中纪委最近还在紧盯国企“逃逸式辞职”，说明高压执行下，很多人宁可“假退真逃”也不愿继续当工具。

　　两会热词“韧性中国”听起来振奋人心，可韧性到底靠什么？靠人形机器人苦练内功？还是靠活生生的人保有判断力、创造力和温度？

　　现实是残酷的：
　　在国企纪委办公室，你既要按《监督执纪工作规则》走流程，又被考核“办案数”“政治站位”。一旦把“真腐败”与“政治任务”混为一谈，就很容易从“反腐卫士”滑向“爪牙”。
　　在智能制造一线，员工被AI取代岗位的同时，还被要求“更快、更狠、更准”执行上级指令，否则就是“不担当”。人成了AI的辅助，甚至成了可替换的“旧零件”。

　　这正是我们今天讨论的核心困境：国家/企业把执行力当成法宝，却常常以消灭人性为代价。文革是极端，大白是教训，2026年的AI时代则是新变种——机器越来越像人，人却被要求越来越像机器。

　　怎么办？没有标准答案，但底线必须守住：

1. 把执行力升级为“有温度的执行力”。能人性化操作就绝不机械化，能从轻处理就绝不层层加码。把“留痕”变成保护人的工具，而不是自保的枷锁。

2. 在AI浪潮中抢回“人”的位置。机器能干重复劳动，人就该干判断、伦理、创新的事。两会强调“投资于人”，不是喊口号，而是真给员工赋能、轮岗、心理缓冲。

3. 个人层面：别彻底工具化。像我们聊过的——拒绝口头指令、冷处理政治任务、主动申请中性岗位、保存底线。丢了饭碗可怕，丢了做人的温度更可怕。

　　2026年，“十五五”规划刚启航，中国要的不是一群只会服从的“螺丝钉”，而是一群有血有肉、有判断力、有同理心的现代人。否则，再先进的机器人、再强的经济韧性，都可能在下一次危机中重蹈“大白”或造反派的覆辙——执行力爆表，人性归零。

　　我们每个人，尤其是体制内从业者，都站在这个十字路口。
　　是继续当“永不生锈的螺丝钉”，还是努力做一颗“会思考、会疼、会温暖”的齿轮？
　　答案不在文件里，在我们每天的选择里。

　　愿2026年的中国，不止有智能机器人闪耀工厂，更有人性的光辉照亮每一位劳动者。

 

When Execution Devours Humanity: From “Red Guards” and “Big Whites” to “Digital Cogs”—A Workplace Wake-Up Call Hidden Behind the 2026 Two Sessions Buzzwords

By HuSir

The just-concluded 2026 National People’s Congress and CPPCC sessions (the “Two Sessions”) saw a flurry of high-frequency buzzwords: “enhancing economic resilience,” “honing internal strengths,” “intelligent manufacturing,” and “embodied intelligent robots.” Delegates and committee members passionately discussed how new technologies and “new quality productive forces” could help China navigate external uncertainties. Companies like the Wuhu Robot Industry Group even highlighted “humanoid robot training” as a core future competitive edge.

On the surface, this paints a grand vision of Chinese-style modernization. But zoom in on the grassroots level—especially in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), discipline inspection offices, and frontline execution roles—and a recurring specter emerges: treating people as machines and treating execution as the sole measure of worth.

This is not a new phenomenon, but in 2026, with AI agents being deployed at scale, it has become particularly glaring.

Think back to the vivid “archetypes” we often discuss today:

• During the Cultural Revolution, the Red Guards (zaofanpai) elevated “revolutionary execution” to the highest principle. Once they put on their red armbands, family members and neighbors instantly became “class enemies.” Their humanity switch was flipped off completely.
• During the pandemic, the “Big Whites” (dàbái)—workers in full protective suits—turned into mobile “zero-COVID machines.” They smashed doors, forcibly transported people, and enforced quarantines, reducing living, breathing individuals to mere “risk points.” Many of those enforcers later suffered from PTSD themselves.
• Today, SOE discipline inspection cadres and frontline employees are repeatedly hammered with demands for “political execution” and “unwavering implementation.” Higher-ups set the tone, pressure cascades down through层层加码 (layer-upon-layer escalation), and when things go wrong, the基层 (grassroots) takes the fall—eerily similar to the Big Whites era.

The most enduring metaphor remains the “screw.” Back in the Lei Feng era, people were urged to become “a screw that never rusts.” Now it’s been upgraded to the “digital screw”: AI agents that can plan autonomously, call tools, and execute tasks. By 2026, they’ve evolved from mere chat assistants into genuine “digital employees” embedded in workflows. Corporate efficiency has indeed soared, but what about the humans? They are now expected to switch off doubt, switch off empathy, and run on “obedience + KPIs” alone. The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) has recently been cracking down on “runaway resignations” in SOEs—people faking retirement or simply fleeing—proof that under extreme pressure, many would rather quit than continue functioning as tools.

The Two Sessions’ rallying cry of a “resilient China” sounds inspiring. But what truly builds resilience? Relentless training of humanoid robots? Or living, breathing people who retain judgment, creativity, and warmth?

The reality is harsh:

• In an SOE discipline inspection office, you must strictly follow the Supervision and Discipline Work Rules while being assessed on case numbers and “political stance.” When “real corruption” gets tangled up with “political tasks,” it’s all too easy to slide from anti-corruption warrior to enforcer’s claw.
• On intelligent manufacturing lines, as employees are displaced by AI, they are simultaneously told to execute instructions “faster, harder, more precisely”—or be labeled as lacking “responsibility.” Humans become mere assistants to machines, or worse, replaceable “obsolete parts.”

This is the core dilemma we face today: the state and enterprises treat execution as the ultimate weapon, yet often at the cost of extinguishing humanity. The Cultural Revolution was an extreme; the Big Whites were a painful lesson; and the 2026 AI era is a new mutation—machines increasingly resemble humans, while humans are forced to become more machine-like.

So what can be done? There is no one-size-fits-all answer, but certain bottom lines must be held:

1. Upgrade execution to “execution with warmth.” Whenever possible, choose humane approaches over mechanical ones; opt for leniency instead of escalation. Turn “leaving a paper trail” into a tool for protecting people, not a shackle for self-preservation.
2. In the AI surge, reclaim the space for being human. Let machines handle repetitive drudgery so people can focus on judgment, ethics, and innovation. The Two Sessions emphasized “investing in people”—not as empty rhetoric, but through real empowerment, job rotation, and psychological support for employees.
3. On a personal level: don’t fully instrumentalize yourself. As we’ve discussed before—politely refuse verbal orders that cross lines, quietly slow-roll purely political tasks, proactively seek neutral positions, and preserve your moral底线 (bottom line). Losing a job is frightening, but losing your human warmth is far worse.

In 2026, as the “15th Five-Year Plan” begins, what China needs is not an army of obedient “screws,” but a population of flesh-and-blood modern citizens with judgment, empathy, and resilience. Otherwise, no matter how advanced the robots or how strong the economic resilience, the next crisis could repeat the tragedies of the Big Whites or Red Guards—execution at maximum power, humanity reduced to zero.

Every one of us, especially those working inside the system, stands at this crossroads.

Will you remain an “ever-rust-proof screw,” or strive to become a gear that thinks, feels pain, and radiates warmth?

The answer isn’t in any document. It lies in the choices we make every single day.

May China in 2026 shine not only with dazzling intelligent robots on factory floors, but with the enduring light of humanity illuminating every worker.